Last night Flickr announced direct sharing integration with Facebook. Sounds great, but as part of Yahoo’s attempt to stay relevant in the social space, it’s integrated with something called either Yahoo Updates or Yahoo Pulse (I can’t figure out if they’re the same thing or not) that adds one more layer of complexity to the privacy picture.

Oh What a CeilingThe premise seems straightforward: each time you upload a photo to Flickr, that photo is shared on your Facebook wall. Once you have things configured, that’s what happens.

How to Setup Flickr to Facebook Connectivity

First, if you’re already using the old Flickr to Facebook integration (which was, to put it nicely, flaky at best), you’ll want to disable that so you don’t end up double-posting. To disable the old system, on Facebook, go to your Profile. Click on Wall, then at the top find the Options link, then Settings, and if you see Flickr, click the little “X” to remove it.

Next go to the Sharing & Extending options of your Flickr account. Near the top you should see the blue button to connect with Facebook. When you click it, you’ll establish the Facebook connection, but you’ll also end up diving into a world of likely having to enable Yahoo Updates. What is Yahoo Updates? If you’re like me, you’d never heard of it previously. From what I can tell, Yahoo Updates is a social sharing system that spans Yahoo services. You’ll need to configure your Yahoo Updates to allow Flickr to share with Facebook (it’s a simple checkbox) and then, in theory, the connection will be established. At least, I think you’re configuring Yahoo Updates. That’s what it’s called in some places, but the page also brands itself as Yahoo Pulse. Pulse, Updates, who knows. It’s cute that Yahoo is trying to establish some sort of sharing platform, but really, are there many people where Yahoo is the center of their sharing world? I don’t know of any such people…

After enabling everything (and scanning Flickr’s Facebook FAQ to make sure I hadn’t missed something), I uploaded a photo to Flickr. About 10 minutes later, there it was on Facebook:

Screenshot of a Flickr image on a Facebook wall

They’ve pulled the image title, description, and some tags with a link to view more of my photostream.

Go forth and re-integrate Flickr and Facebook.

It Works, But WTF?

Is this a good thing? Did Yahoo just spend a bunch of effort to fix something that wasn’t broken? Is Yahoo Pulse relevant? What if they’d done something truly interesting like allowed for cross-site photo comments instead of two silos? Flickr is great for getting comments from photographers, but what about comments from the wider population on Facebook?

If you’re new here, you can keep up with my latest photography information at Picture Pundit – subscribe to my newsletter for a FREE Report: A Guide to Twitter for Photographers.

While searching Flickr tonight I noticed something that caught my eye:

Flickr from Yahoo

That little “from Yahoo!” is new. Even though Yahoo acquired Flickr over four years ago, the Flickr logo had remained un-Yahooed until now.

What does it mean? Probably nothing too significant, other than to remind users that Flickr is the largest remaining Yahoo property that hasn’t yet tanked or lost market share in any big way.

For more thoughts on the logo change, view a Twitter search… at the time of this post it seems that most folks aren’t happy.

These other posts might be of interest to you:

  1. New Flickr + Facebook Integration Marred by Irrelevant Yahoo Clutter
  2. Binghoo! and the Future of Flickr
  3. Flickr + Twitter is Live, What about Licensing/Legalities?

Steve Ballmer signs the Microsoft-Yahoo! agreementThe big news in the tech world yesterday was an agreement between Yahoo and Microsoft which essentially shuts down Yahoo’s search business, with Yahoo searches to now be powered by Microsoft’s Bing search engine and the companies to share revenue from ad sales. Will there be an impact on Flickr, a Yahoo property and one of the most popular ways to share photos online?

I think there are two answers to this question. The first response is that no, there probably won’t be any direct impact on Flickr. I haven’t seen anything in any of the coverage of the agreement that indicates Bing would enter the Flickr world. My expectation is that Flickr photos would be indexed as they are now.

The other answer is that yes, this will affect Flickr. With this agreement, Yahoo is no longer in the search business. Various recent Yahoo changes have pretty much neglected Flickr. Even after Flickr’s creators left the company, other executives (such as the CEO) with responsibility for the Flickr property have remained quiet about Flickr, haven’t used the service, and it’s never included as part of Yahoo’s major announcements about the company.

Yahoo seems to be an organization without direction. While they’re keeping the lights on at Flickr and making minor feature improvements (such as the Flickr Twitter integration), it’s clear that there’s no strong push to innovate. Facebook and it’s millions of users are sharing photos like crazy with the ability to comment, tag people, and more. Sites such as SmugMug and Photoshelter are providing options for those looking for a more professional appearance or wanting to make sales. Flickr is in a middle ground with an uncertain future.

What’s next for Flickr? What do you think?

Photo by Yodel Anecdotal, used under Creative Commons licensing